← All posts

Why meeting last year's cut-off doesn't guarantee admission

Nov 16, 2026·5 min read Share

Your child scores AL14, and a secondary school’s previous cut-off was 14. It looks like a match. So why might your child still be posted elsewhere?

There are two main reasons: the school’s cut-off can change in the new posting exercise, and applicants with the same score may be separated by tie-breakers.

What a historical cut-off tells you

A secondary school’s cut-off point (COP) is determined by the PSLE score of the last student posted to that school in each Posting Group. With AL scores, a lower number is better.

MOE explains that SchoolFinder’s historical score ranges reflect the previous P6 cohort’s results and school choices. The next cohort can produce a different outcome.

For a real reference, Kranji Secondary School had a non-affiliated Posting Group 3 COP of 14 in the 2025 S1 Posting exercise, for the 2026 Secondary 1 intake, according to MOE SchoolFinder.

That historical 14 helps you shortlist schools. It does not reserve a place for every AL14 applicant in the next exercise.

Check the cohort, Posting Group and affiliation category when comparing scores. Our secondary school COP table labels scores by the year students enter Secondary 1. The 2026 admission figures therefore describe the earlier posting exercise, not the outcome for children taking the PSLE in 2026 and entering Secondary 1 in 2027.

Two ways an AL14 applicant could miss out

The following Kranji examples are hypothetical future outcomes, starting from its real historical COP of 14. They are not predictions or reported posting results.

Example 1: the new cut-off becomes 13. Suppose students scoring AL13 or better fill Kranji’s available Posting Group 3 places, with the last student posted scoring AL13. The new COP would be 13. An AL14 applicant would miss that new cut-off, despite matching the previous 14.

Example 2: the new cut-off stays at 14. Suppose places remain after applicants with better scores are considered, but more AL14 applicants compete for those places than the school can take. Some AL14 students could be admitted and others could miss out. The final COP could still be 14.

The second example explains why even matching the cut-off eventually recorded for your own posting exercise does not mean every applicant with that score gets a place.

How ties are resolved

Under MOE’s posting rules, students with better PSLE scores have priority for vacancies in their chosen schools. When students with the same score compete for the last available places, these tie-breakers apply in order:

1. Citizenship: Singapore Citizens, then Permanent Residents, then International Students.
2. School choice order: an earlier choice gets priority.
3. Computerised balloting: used if the score, citizenship and choice order are all the same.

For example, imagine two AL14 Singapore Citizens, both eligible for Posting Group 3, competing for the last Kranji place with no additional priority applying. One listed Kranji first. The other listed it second and did not get a place at their first choice. The first-choice Kranji applicant would have priority. If both had listed Kranji first, computerised balloting would resolve the tie.

Putting a school first helps at the choice-order tie-breaker. It does not put an AL14 applicant ahead of an AL13 applicant. Our guide to putting a school second or third works through the different-score and tied-score cases. MOE also sets additional rules for affiliation priority and SAP schools; check those if they apply to your choices.

An appeal uses the new posting year’s cut-off

For a non-medical transfer appeal, MOE requires your child to meet the school’s COP from the posting exercise just completed, as well as its admission criteria. The school must also have vacancies.

Using the hypothetical examples above:

• If Kranji’s new COP were 13, an AL14 child would not meet that appeal score requirement. The previous COP of 14 would not change this.
• If its new COP were 14, an AL14 child would meet the score requirement. An offer would still depend on vacancies and the school’s admission criteria.

Hai Sing Catholic School’s official appeal FAQ makes the same distinction: the score must meet the school’s COP of the posting year, and transfers depend on vacancies and school-based criteria.

Meeting the appeal threshold gives you a basis to apply. It does not tell you how likely an appeal is to succeed.

A short fallback and appeal checklist

Before submitting choices, use all six slots for eligible schools your child would be willing to attend, with a range of historical COPs. Include options whose previous cut-offs are less demanding than your child’s score, while checking travel, programmes and school fit. Historical scores cannot make any choice a guaranteed fallback.

After posting results, if you are considering an appeal:

1. Check the new COP for the relevant Posting Group and category. Ask the school if the applicable score is unclear.
2. Read the target school’s current Secondary 1 appeal notice. Check the intake year, eligibility, form, supporting documents and deadline. An old intake’s form or a Secondary 2/3 transfer page may not apply.
3. Submit a non-medical appeal directly to the preferred school, following its instructions. Meeting the score requirement alone is insufficient.
4. Complete the posted school’s formalities and follow its reporting instructions. Your child should continue attending that school while waiting for an appeal outcome.

If the posted school cannot accommodate a serious medical condition or severe physical impairment, contact the posted school immediately about MOE’s separate medical appeal route. MOE’s current guidance sets a deadline of 12pm on the next working day after posting results and requires supporting medical documents.

Check the school’s notice for the intake you are applying for when posting results are released.